Pacific Legal Foundation v. State of California
GPTKB entity
Statements (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:affiliatedWith |
gptkb:Pacific_Legal_Foundation
government agencies non-profit organizations academic institutions community organizations research organizations law firms business associations legal advocacy groups think tanks environmental advocacy groups real estate associations judicial organizations property rights organizations California_government |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
S250000
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:California_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:filedIn |
California_state_attorneys
Pacific_Legal_Foundation_attorneys |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Pacific Legal Foundation v. State of California
|
| gptkbp:impact |
developers
environmental groups property owners |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Pacific_Legal_Foundation
State of California |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:U.S._Constitution
gptkb:California_Environmental_Quality_Act California Constitution environmental regulations property rights public interest lawyers Takings Clause private attorneys state environmental law federal_environmental_law |
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruling in favor of property rights
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influence on future cases
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
media coverage
political debate criticism from environmentalists support from property rights advocates |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
gptkb:Nollan_v._California_Coastal_Commission gptkb:Lucas_v._South_Carolina_Coastal_Council |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
federal property rights
California_land_use_law |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on land use policy
|
| gptkbp:year |
2021
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
January 2020
April 2021 |