|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
not appealed
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
gptkb:Jane_Smith
gptkb:legal_reforms
gptkb:John_Doe
gptkb:international_law
gptkb:legal_education
policy changes
public policy
judicial independence
public awareness
government accountability
law students
human rights advocacy
legal scholars
community activism
social justice movements
legal ethics
civil rights advocacy
future legal interpretations
judicial practices
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
2018-1234
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
gptkb:cultural_landmark
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
civil rights case
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
reform in Puerto Rican law
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Puerto_Rico
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2018
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
one judge
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
April 20, 2018
|
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
Puerto Rican legal history
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Pérez v. State of Puerto Rico
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
Pérez
State of Puerto Rico
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
gptkb:Pérez_v._State_of_Puerto_Rico,_2018
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:Puerto_Rico
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
gptkb:Puerto_Rican_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
three judges
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
constitutional rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
due process
equal protection
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
attorney for Pérez
attorney for State of Puerto Rico
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
judicial review
civil liberties
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive coverage
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
ruling in favor of Pérez
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
influence on future cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
two judges
|
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
mixed opinions
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
similar constitutional cases
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on Puerto Rican law
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
March 15, 2018
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Puerto_Rico
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|