Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
GPTKB entity
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
2021-1
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 18-1001
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
April 5, 2021
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
open source software
software industry API usage |
| gptkbp:involves |
software development
copyright law |
| gptkbp:judges |
Judge_Kara_Farnandez_Stoll
Judge_Kathleen_O'Malley Judge_Richard_Taranto |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Google's_legal_team
fair use influenced future litigation influenced tech policy discussions affected developer community defined scope of fair use in software encouraged innovation in software development fostered competition in software market increased clarity in copyright law influences software licensing practices promoted open standards reaffirmed fair use doctrine reduced risk for developers set precedent for tech companies shaped future copyright legislation supported interoperability Oracle's_legal_team clarified_API_copyright_issues |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Google's_use_of_Java_API_was_fair_use
|
| gptkbp:party |
gptkb:Google_Inc.
gptkb:Oracle_America,_Inc. |
| gptkbp:precedent |
impact on software copyright cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Google_LLC_v._Oracle_America,_Inc.
Oracle_America,_Inc._v._Google_Inc._(2010) Oracle_America,_Inc._v._Google_Inc._(2012) Oracle_America,_Inc._v._Google_Inc._(2014) Oracle_America,_Inc._v._Google_Inc._(2016) Oracle_America,_Inc._v._Google_Inc._(2018) Oracle_America,_Inc._v._Google_LLC |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Android_operating_system
gptkb:Java_programming_language |