Statements (21)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
High Court of Australia case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
(1989) 166 CLR 211
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:Australia
|
| gptkbp:date |
1989
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Nicolo case (1989)
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Brennan_J
gptkb:Dawson_J gptkb:Deane_J gptkb:Gaudron_J gptkb:Mason_CJ gptkb:McHugh_J gptkb:Toohey_J gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia |
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
Interpretation of section 109 of the Australian Constitution
Validity of statutes inconsistent with the Constitution |
| gptkbp:officialName |
Nicolo v Commonwealth
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Australian
Section 109 of the Australian Constitution |
| gptkbp:significance |
First time the High Court held that it could declare an Act of Parliament invalid for inconsistency with the Constitution
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:French_administrative_law
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|