Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
No. 69-1
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
United_States_prevails
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Civil case
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
402 U.S. 634
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Public policy
Resource management Environmental regulations Land use planning Federal-state relations |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:date |
1970-06-29
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Supreme_Court 1970-01-01 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
gptkb:Robert_H._Bork
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr. 1970-10-14 |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Post-World_War_II_land_policies
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Nevada v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
State vs. federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
Statehood issues
Western land disputes |
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States_government
State of Nevada |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall Justice Harry Blackmun |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
State rights
Federal supremacy Clarified federal authority over state claims Federal land rights Land grant issues |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:Taylor_Grazing_Act
gptkb:Federal_Land_Policy_and_Management_Act |
| gptkbp:notableQuote |
"State claims must yield to federal authority."
"The federal government has a vested interest in land management." "The decision reinforces federal jurisdiction over public lands." "This case sets a precedent for future land disputes." The_United_States_has_the_right_to_manage_its_lands. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
In_favor_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Land use cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._California
gptkb:United_States_v._New_Mexico |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Public land management
|