National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
GPTKB entity
Statements (53)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:compact
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
elimination of the Electoral College
|
| gptkbp:can_lead_to |
more competitive presidential elections
|
| gptkbp:example |
collaborative governance among states
|
| gptkbp:has_established |
many state legislatures
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
state sovereignty in electoral matters
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
|
| gptkbp:is_a_focal_point_for |
advocacy groups pushing for electoral change
|
| gptkbp:is_a_potential_catalyst_for |
future electoral reforms
|
| gptkbp:is_a_potential_model_for |
other democratic nations.
|
| gptkbp:is_a_subject_of |
civic engagement organizations
debate among political scientists legislative proposals in various states |
| gptkbp:is_a_way_to |
increase voter turnout
address voter apathy modernize the electoral system |
| gptkbp:is_adopted_by |
gptkb:2001
|
| gptkbp:is_analyzed_in |
political analysts and commentators
|
| gptkbp:is_based_on |
the principle of one person, one vote
|
| gptkbp:is_challenged_by |
court cases regarding its legality
|
| gptkbp:is_designed_to |
align state electoral votes with the national popular vote
|
| gptkbp:is_discussed_in |
academic and political forums
|
| gptkbp:is_featured_in |
media coverage and reports
|
| gptkbp:is_implemented_in |
a coalition of states
|
| gptkbp:is_influenced_by |
public opinion on electoral reform
|
| gptkbp:is_often_compared_to |
other electoral reform proposals
|
| gptkbp:is_often_referenced_in |
discussions about voter disenfranchisement
|
| gptkbp:is_opposed_by |
some political groups
|
| gptkbp:is_part_of |
the ongoing evolution of U. S. electoral politics
|
| gptkbp:is_part_of_a_broader_movement |
to reform the electoral process in the U. S.
|
| gptkbp:is_part_of_a_larger_discussion_about |
democracy in the United States
|
| gptkbp:is_related_to |
the concept of direct democracy
the concept of federalism |
| gptkbp:is_supported_by |
various advocacy groups
some major political parties |
| gptkbp:is_viewed_as_a_solution_to |
the winner-takes-all system in most states
|
| gptkbp:legal_status |
subject to state legislation
|
| gptkbp:mechanism_of_action |
ensuring that every vote counts equally
|
| gptkbp:number_of_states_participating |
gptkb:15
|
| gptkbp:political_impact |
could change how campaigns are conducted
|
| gptkbp:promotes |
equal voting power across states
|
| gptkbp:purpose |
to ensure the election of the President of the United States by popular vote
|
| gptkbp:ratified_by |
states with a majority of electoral votes
|
| gptkbp:requires |
states to award electoral votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote
|
| gptkbp:sponsorship |
former presidents and governors
|
| gptkbp:strategic_goals |
reduce the influence of swing states
|
| gptkbp:topics |
U. S. political discourse
|
| gptkbp:total_electoral_votes_of_participating_states |
196
|
| gptkbp:was_a_response_to |
discrepancies between popular and electoral vote outcomes
the 2000 presidential election outcome the growing divide in political representation |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:election
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|