|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
Supreme Court judgment
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
(2016) 5 SCC 1
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:India
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:J._Chelameswar
|
|
gptkbp:effect
|
Restored collegium system for appointment of judges
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs Union of India
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
NJAC verdict
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:J._Chelameswar
gptkb:J._S._Khehar
gptkb:Kurian_Joseph
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
Adarsh Kumar Goel
M. B. Lokur
|
|
gptkbp:judgmentDate
|
2015-10-16
|
|
gptkbp:leader
|
H. L. Dattu
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:J._S._Khehar
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_Advocates-on-Record_Association
|
|
gptkbp:powers
|
5
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
gptkb:Basic_structure_doctrine
Judicial independence
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014
99th Constitutional Amendment
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Union_of_India
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
Constitutionality of National Judicial Appointments Commission
|
|
gptkbp:verdict
|
Declared NJAC Act and 99th Constitutional Amendment unconstitutional
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:J._S._Khehar
gptkb:Chief_Justice_J._S._Khehar
gptkb:Justice_J.S._Khehar
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|