Statements (38)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:military
|
| gptkbp:argumentAgainst |
Title IX compliance
impact on education impact on non-revenue sports potential for corruption preserving amateurism |
| gptkbp:argumentFor |
fairness
athletes deserve compensation athletes generate revenue |
| gptkbp:beganIn |
20th century
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
NCAA pay-for-play debate
|
| gptkbp:intensified |
2010s
2020s |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:NCAA
universities coaches fans college athletes lawmakers |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Title_IX
gptkb:O'Bannon_v._NCAA revenue sharing athlete endorsements Supreme Court rulings athlete scholarships Alston v. NCAA NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) rights athlete labor rights athlete unionization student-athlete status |
| gptkbp:resultedIn |
gptkb:legislative_body
NCAA rule changes NIL policy changes federal proposals |
| gptkbp:topic |
NCAA amateurism rules
college athlete compensation |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Sports_controversies_in_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|