Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka
GPTKB entity
Statements (122)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
public interest litigation
C.A._No._265_of_1992 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
AIR 1992 SC 1858
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1992
The court ruled on the issue of medical education admissions. |
| gptkbp:discusses |
A subject of debate in legal forums.
A topic of interest in legal research. Frequently discussed in legal studies. Often referenced in legal textbooks. |
| gptkbp:doctrine |
right to education
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
Mohini Jain
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
A foundational case for educational reform.
Considered a milestone in the right to education movement. Continues to influence legal thought on education. A_significant_case_in_the_history_of_Indian_jurisprudence. |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Encouraged judicial scrutiny of educational policies.
Encouraged reforms in admission policies. Influenced policies on medical college admissions. Led to reforms in medical education policies. Shaped the discourse on educational equity. influenced medical admission policies Shaped_the_future_of_medical_education_in_India. |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Mohini Jain
State_of_Karnataka |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_M._Jagannadha_Rao
gptkb:Justice_M._H._Kania gptkb:Justice_K._Ramaswamy gptkb:Justice_S._C._Agarwal March 14, 1992 examined state policies held that medical education is a right |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
merit-based admissions
admission criteria Admission criteria for medical colleges. Right to equality in education. |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Advocate S. S. Shankaranarayanan
Advocate_S._R._Suryanarayana |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Constitution of India.
upheld the right to education Article_14_of_the_Constitution. Article_21_of_the_Constitution. Article_30_of_the_Constitution. education_rights_in_India |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
constitutional law
impact on public policy impact on legal precedents impact on legal standards impact on legal accountability impact on legal frameworks impact on legal interpretations impact on legal reforms impact on educational standards impact on educational reforms impact on higher education impact on government policies impact on social justice impact on educational equity impact on student rights impact on educational policies impact on state regulations A pivotal case in the evolution of educational rights. Influenced the interpretation of educational rights. A key case in the study of educational law. Affected future legislation on education. Cited in educational policy discussions. Cited in various legal arguments. Critically analyzed in law journals. Discussed in various legal seminars. Examined for its constitutional implications. Examined the intersection of law and education. Highlighted issues of social justice. Influenced public policy on education. Set a precedent for future educational litigation. Set a standard for future educational policies. Significant in the context of educational rights. impact on access to education impact on admission transparency impact on constitutional rights impact on educational access policies impact on educational access rights impact on educational equity laws impact on educational institutions impact on educational justice impact on educational policy reforms impact on equality in education impact on judicial activism impact on legal education framework impact on legal education reforms impact on legal education rights impact on legal frameworks for education impact on legal rights advocacy impact on medical education access impact on private institutions impact on state responsibilities impact on student admissions landmark ruling in education law Analyzed the balance between merit and reservation. A landmark ruling in the context of educational rights. Influenced the legal framework surrounding education. Remains a critical reference point in legal education. Continues to be relevant in discussions on education. A_landmark_judgment_in_Indian_legal_history. Frequently_cited_in_Supreme_Court_judgments. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
struck down discriminatory practices
Reinforced the principle of equality before the law. Promoted transparency in admission processes. Reaffirmed the importance of merit in admissions. affirmed the need for fair admissions Reinforced the judiciary's role in educational matters. Promoted the idea of equal opportunity in education. Promoted the principle of meritocracy in education. Struck down the management quota in medical admissions. |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set a precedent for future education-related cases.
established guidelines for medical admissions |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
T.M.A._Pai_Foundation_v._State_of_Karnataka
Unni_Krishnan_v._State_of_Andhra_Pradesh |
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
State_of_Karnataka
|
| gptkbp:significance |
It addressed the right to education.
|
| gptkbp:year |
1992
|