Statements (21)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:citation |
Case No. C10-1823JLR
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
2013-04-25
|
| gptkbp:defendant |
gptkb:Motorola
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
gptkb:Microsoft_Corp._v._Motorola,_Inc.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Microsoft v. Motorola
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:James_L._Robart
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Washington |
| gptkbp:notableFor |
impact on patent licensing law
landmark FRAND royalty determination |
| gptkbp:plaintiff |
gptkb:Microsoft
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Wi-Fi patents
video coding patents |
| gptkbp:result |
court determined reasonable royalty rates for Motorola's standard-essential patents
|
| gptkbp:subject |
patent infringement
FRAND licensing standard-essential patents |
| gptkbp:yearFiled |
2010
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Fish_&_Richardson
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|