Statements (20)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
gptkb:491_U.S._110
|
| gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor |
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
1989
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr. |
| gptkbp:fullName |
gptkb:Michael_H._v._Gerald_D.,_et_al.
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
A California law limiting the rights of a biological father to establish paternity of a child born to a married woman does not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Michael H. v. Gerald D.
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
parental rights
substantive due process |
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:subject |
gptkb:constitutional_law
gptkb:family |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|