|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
judicial selection system
|
|
gptkbp:adoptedBy
|
gptkb:Alaska
gptkb:Arizona
gptkb:Colorado
gptkb:Florida
gptkb:Indiana
gptkb:Iowa
gptkb:Kansas
gptkb:Nebraska
gptkb:Oklahoma
gptkb:South_Dakota
gptkb:Tennessee
gptkb:Utah
gptkb:Wyoming
gptkb:California_(for_appellate_courts)
|
|
gptkbp:aimsTo
|
reduce political influence in judicial selection
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Missouri_Plan
|
|
gptkbp:criticizedFor
|
lack of direct voter input
potential for commission bias
|
|
gptkbp:firstReleased
|
1940
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Merit Plan
|
|
gptkbp:influencedBy
|
gptkb:progressive_reform_movement
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gubernatorial appointment
retention election
judicial nominating commission
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:Missouri
|
|
gptkbp:step
|
commission selects nominees
governor appoints judge from nominees
judge faces retention election after short term
|
|
gptkbp:supportedBy
|
gptkb:American_Bar_Association
judicial reform advocates
|
|
gptkbp:usedFor
|
judicial appointments
|
|
gptkbp:usedIn
|
gptkb:United_States
various U.S. states
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Missouri_Plan
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|