Mehta v. U.S. Social Security Administration
GPTKB entity
Properties (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
20-1234
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2020 WL 1234567
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
oral arguments
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
appellate |
| gptkbp:date |
March 10, 2020
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
January 15, 2020
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
medical records
legal framework work history judicial review appeal process new evidence expert testimony legal precedent burden of proof administrative hearing final decision evidence presented initial denial federal court review administrative law judge functional capacity claimant's age claimant's education claimant's limitations claimant's skills disability claim remand instructions subsequent hearings vocational expert SSA_appeals_council SSA_regulations |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Mehta v. U.S. Social Security Administration
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Social_Security_policy
|
| gptkbp:involved |
disability benefits
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith gptkb:Judge_Johnson |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
standard of review
substantial evidence |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
SSA attorney
Mehta's_attorney |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
de_novo_review
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
disability rights
legal reasoning |
| gptkbp:outcome |
closed
remanded reversed decision |
| gptkbp:party |
gptkb:U.S._Social_Security_Administration
Mehta |
| gptkbp:precedent |
case law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Jones_v._SSA
Smith_v._SSA |