Mehta v. U.S. Federal Trade Commission
GPTKB entity
Properties (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
FTC's_authority
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
FTC-2020-001
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
20-1234
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
affirmed majority opinion dissenting opinion |
| gptkbp:date |
2021-06-30
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2021
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
2020-01-15
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
expert opinions
public interest consumer rights legal challenges legal precedents regulatory framework testimonies consumer complaints business ethics market practices regulatory challenges administrative hearings evidence presented regulatory compliance issues Mehta's business practices FTC's_investigation FTC's_mandate |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Mehta v. U.S. Federal Trade Commission
|
| gptkbp:impact |
consumer protection
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:U.S._Federal_Trade_Commission
Mehta |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
trade regulation
due process |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
FTC attorney
Mehta's_attorney |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
administrative procedures
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
FTC Act
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
regulatory compliance
legal scholars reviewed by legal experts trade regulation enforcement Mehta_v._FTC,_123_F.3d_456_(2021) future_FTC_actions |
| gptkbp:outcome |
appeal decision
unfavorable_for_Mehta upheld_FTC's_decision |
| gptkbp:precedent |
administrative law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
similar_FTC_cases
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on trade practices
|