Mehta v. U.S. Department of Treasury
GPTKB entity
Statements (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
gptkb:U.S._Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
20-1234
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:U.S._Court_of_Appeals
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
2020-05-15
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Mehta v. U.S. Department of Treasury
|
| gptkbp:impact |
taxpayer rights
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:U.S._Department_of_Treasury
Mehta |
| gptkbp:judges |
majority opinion
dissenting opinion |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal court
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
federalism
public interest government accountability checks and balances constitutional law judicial review separation of powers regulatory authority transparency in government due process administrative law injunctive relief federal jurisdiction federal statutes burden of proof standing declaratory judgment statutory interpretation administrative discretion equal protection remedies available administrative hearings agency regulations substantive due process administrative appeals administrative law principles arbitrary and capricious standard administrative law standards exhaustion of remedies equitable relief judicial remedies agency action procedural due process state law implications Chevron_deference Mehta's_attorney U.S._Department_of_Treasury's_attorney |
| gptkbp:outcome |
decision_in_favor_of_Mehta
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influences future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Johnson_v._U.S._Department_of_Treasury
Smith_v._U.S._Department_of_Treasury |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
tax law
|
| gptkbp:significance |
administrative procedures
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2021-03-10
|
| gptkbp:year |
2021
|