Mehta v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
GPTKB entity
Properties (71)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
gptkb:U.S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
19-55767
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil rights case
19-55767 |
| gptkbp:court |
government accountability
affirmed lower court ruling majority opinion government overreach statutory interpretation upheld rights majority ruling unconstitutional actions upheld constitutional rights violations of rights clarified legal standards review of evidence concurring opinion reaffirmed rights District_Court |
| gptkbp:date |
August 2020
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:U.S._Court_of_Appeals
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
Mehta's_immigration_status
Mehta's_legal_journey |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Mehta v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
|
| gptkbp:impact |
immigrant rights
influences public opinion |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:U.S._Department_of_Homeland_Security
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:U.S._Department_of_Homeland_Security
Mehta |
| gptkbp:judges |
administrative decisions
reversal of lower court decision arbitrary and capricious standard dissent by Judge |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
due process
immigration policy |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
private attorney review of statutory provisions impact on policy |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Administrative Procedure Act
federal regulations constitutional law national security issues federal immigration law unlawful detention affects future litigation strategies challenges to government actions sets a precedent |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
policy changes
ongoing legal debates impact on future cases future legal challenges 2020 WL 1234567 involved multiple parties current immigration debates future litigation affects future immigration cases affects policy enforcement |
| gptkbp:outcome |
remand to lower court
revised legal interpretations changed enforcement practices reinstatement of benefits revised immigration policies favorable_ruling_for_Mehta ruling_in_favor_of_Mehta |
| gptkbp:precedent |
established case law
affects immigration law |
| gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
federal courts
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
precedent cases
|
| gptkbp:year |
2020
|