Mehta v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
GPTKB entity
Properties (53)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
appealed_to_the_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
20-1234
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Mehta v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
|
| gptkbp:impact |
healthcare regulations
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:U.S._Department_of_Health_and_Human_Services
Mehta |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
judicial review
administrative law healthcare_policy standing to sue exhaustion of remedies |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Department_of_Health_and_Human_Services_attorney
Mehta's_attorney |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
high-profile case
impact on healthcare access analyzed in law reviews cited in future cases impact on public health initiatives impact on judicial review impact on administrative law impact on public health law widely discussed in legal circles impact on healthcare funding impact on healthcare legislation impact on healthcare delivery impact on healthcare system impact on government policy influences administrative decisions impact on healthcare regulations impact on administrative procedures sets a precedent for similar cases impact on state regulations impact on federal regulations impact on healthcare access rights impact on healthcare administration impact on healthcare equity impact on healthcare litigation impact on healthcare outcomes impact on healthcare policy debates impact on healthcare policy implementation impact on healthcare reform impact on legal remedies impact on legal standing impact on patient advocacy impact on patient rights important for public health policy |
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruling_in_favor_of_Mehta
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
affects future healthcare cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
similar healthcare litigation
|