|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:326_U.S._501
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1946-01-07
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:State_of_Alabama
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Felix_Frankfurter
gptkb:Harold_Hitz_Burton
gptkb:Stanley_Forman_Reed
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
114
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Private property used for public purposes is subject to constitutional protections for free speech.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Marsh v. Alabama
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Chickasaw,_Alabama
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Hugo_Black
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Grace_Marsh
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Constitutional rights can apply to private actors in certain circumstances.
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Amalgamated_Food_Employees_Union_v._Logan_Valley_Plaza,_Inc.
gptkb:Lloyd_Corp._v._Tanner
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:company
gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
freedom of speech
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:State_action_doctrine
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|