Statements (60)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:administrativeDivision |
held accountable for actions
|
| gptkbp:admissionFee |
M._A.
|
| gptkbp:advocacy |
advocacy for legal reforms
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
001/2011
|
| gptkbp:casualties |
support for victims of human rights violations
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:African_Court_on_Human_and_Peoples'_Rights
|
| gptkbp:criticism |
subject to international scrutiny
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
violation of rights
|
| gptkbp:filedWith |
2011
|
| gptkbp:governmentType |
criticized for its actions
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
M. A. v. Ethiopia
|
| gptkbp:impact |
impact on victims' rights advocacy
influence_on_African_human_rights_law |
| gptkbp:independence |
highlighted issues of judicial independence
|
| gptkbp:internationalClassification |
gained international attention
|
| gptkbp:internationalRelations |
relevance to international law
|
| gptkbp:is_a_platform_for |
violation of the right to a fair trial
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:judges_of_the_African_Court
enforcement challenges 2014-03-28 subject to judicial review |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
African_human_rights_system
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
human rights violations
faced legal challenges during proceedings contradicted international law |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
lawyers involved
criticized for lack of independence subject of legal analysis |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
criticized for human rights practices |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
relevant to ongoing human rights discussions
analyzed in various legal journals comprehensive case documentation exists extensive case documentation available implications for future human rights litigation implications for state accountability legal implications for state behavior. resolved through international legal mechanisms significant for victims of human rights abuses used as a case study in legal education significant_for_African_human_rights_jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:outcome |
compensation awarded
positive outcome for the applicant various case outcomes discussed |
| gptkbp:precedent |
set a precedent for future cases
established legal precedent |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
raised public awareness of human rights issues
|
| gptkbp:reform |
prompted discussions on legal reforms
|
| gptkbp:region |
impact on regional human rights practices
|
| gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
analyzed the case
|
| gptkbp:relatedEvent |
monitoring of compliance
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
other human rights cases
|
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
gptkb:Ethiopia
|
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark case
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2013-10-15
|
| gptkbp:student_organizations |
supported the case
|
| gptkbp:UNESCO_World_Heritage_Site |
engaged in advocacy related to the case
|
| gptkbp:was_a_response_to |
denial of allegations
|
| gptkbp:year |
2012
|