Statements (24)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:alsoKnownAs |
M'Naghten test
|
| gptkbp:appliesTo |
gptkb:crime
|
| gptkbp:basisFor |
insanity defense in Australia
insanity defense in Canada insanity defense in India insanity defense in the United States |
| gptkbp:contrastsWith |
ALI Model Penal Code test
Durham rule Irresistible impulse test |
| gptkbp:criticizedFor |
narrow definition of insanity
focus on cognitive understanding |
| gptkbp:establishedBy |
gptkb:House_of_Lords
|
| gptkbp:establishedIn |
1843
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
M'Naghten rule
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
insanity defense laws in common law countries
|
| gptkbp:namedAfter |
Daniel M'Naghten
|
| gptkbp:originatedIn |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:replacedBy |
other insanity tests in some jurisdictions
|
| gptkbp:state |
A defendant is not responsible for criminal action if, due to mental disease, they did not know the nature and quality of the act or did not know it was wrong.
|
| gptkbp:usedIn |
some U.S. states
insanity defense |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:People_v._Drew_(1978)
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|