gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:law
|
gptkbp:area
|
gptkb:English_contract_law
inequality of bargaining power
undue influence
|
gptkbp:citation
|
[1975] QB 326
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
gptkbp:date
|
1974
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Bundy
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Justice_Sir_Eric_Sachs
gptkb:Justice_Stephenson
gptkb:Lord_Denning_MR
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Lloyds_Bank_Ltd
|
gptkbp:plotSummary
|
A case where a bank took advantage of a vulnerable customer, leading to the development of the doctrine of undue influence in English law.
|
gptkbp:principle
|
inequality of bargaining power
undue influence
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Williams_v_Walker-Thomas_Furniture_Co.
|
gptkbp:result
|
Bundy succeeded; contract set aside due to undue influence
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Expanded the doctrine of undue influence and inequality of bargaining power in contract law
|
gptkbp:subject
|
guarantee of son's business debts
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Lord_Denning
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|