|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
analysis of arguments
implications for future cases
analysis of evidence
analysis of legal standards
implications for legislation
implications for policy
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
summary of facts
summary of ruling
summary of implications
94-1234
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:majority_opinion
dissenting opinion
affirmed lower court
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
appeal
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
March 15, 1994
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:1994
published opinion
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
Docket No. 94-1234
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
June 1, 1994
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Lewis vs. Mc Call II
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
civil liberties
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Mc_Call
gptkb:Lewis
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
123 F.3d 456
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Judge_Smith
gptkb:Judge_Brown
Judge Johnson
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
gptkb:court_cases
appellant
appellee
1990s civil rights era
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
civil rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
due process
equal protection
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
defendant attorney
plaintiff attorney
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
appeal upheld
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Lewis_v._Mc_Call_I
gptkb:Mc_Call_v._Lewis
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on civil rights law
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Lennox_Lewis
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|