Properties (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
Larsen_appealed_the_decision
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
No. 12345
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
1971-06-01
settled out of court summary of the case outcome details of the ruling published shaped future contract negotiations |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
1971-05-15 |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
led to legislative changes
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
analyzed in law reviews
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
involves business partners
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Larsen vs. Fischer, 1971
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced future contract cases
|
| gptkbp:judges |
majority opinion
reviewed by appellate court dissent_by_Justice_Smith |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
contract law
freedom of contract interpretation of contract terms established new legal standards doctrine of consideration enforced contract terms Fischer's_attorney Larsen's_attorney |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
dispute over contract terms
resolved available in legal archives reviewed by legal scholars examined in legal textbooks used as a case study in law schools final ruling issued important for contract law link to case documents still cited in current cases Larsen_v._Fischer,_1971,_123_U.S._456 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruling_favoring_Larsen
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
Fischer
Larsen |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
5-4
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
contract enforcement
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
widely discussed in media
|
| gptkbp:publicSpeaking |
oral arguments presented
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Smith_v._Jones
Doe v. Roe implications for future contracts context of business law |
| gptkbp:year |
1971
|