Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
no appeal filed
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
47
divorce |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Family_Court
gptkb:Sydney |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
custody arrangement
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
January 2020
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kua v. Kua (No 47)
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Kua
Kua's_spouse |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Smith
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Australia
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
child welfare
conflict resolution mediation financial disclosure property division child support guidelines substance abuse issues cultural considerations child support visitation rights burden of proof best interests of the child dispute resolution processes mental health considerations equitable distribution collaborative law property valuation enforcement of orders modification of orders parenting plans spousal maintenance appeal rights disclosure obligations evidence standards parental responsibility legal representation rights family violence considerations income assessment child custody evaluation child's wishes court's discretion fairness in divorce financial needs assessment parenting capacity assessment property settlement principles spousal support criteria |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
lawyers
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
impact on family law
|
| gptkbp:order |
final parenting orders
property settlement order |
| gptkbp:outcome |
settlement reached
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
family law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Kua_v._Kua_(No_48)
gptkb:Kua_v._Kua_(No_46) |
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
March 2020
|
| gptkbp:year |
2020
|