Properties (62)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
not applicable
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
divorce
FAM_1234/2020 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2020] FamCA 39
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Family_Court
gptkb:Sydney favorable to Kua favorable to spouse |
| gptkbp:date |
March 2020
|
| gptkbp:description |
divorce proceedings
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
January 2020
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kua v. Kua (No 39)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
family law reform
|
| gptkbp:is_a_document_that |
court order
financial disclosure evidence submission financial statement affidavit of service property valuation affidavit parenting plan subpoena interim orders final orders request for information application for orders case brief case management order child support agreement child welfare report court notice court report court transcript decree absolute disclosure statement expert report mediation report notice of appeal parenting assessment property settlement agreement response to application separation agreement settlement proposal witness statement |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Kua
Kua's_spouse |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Smith
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Australia
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
child custody
best interests of the child property settlement |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
lawyer
family lawyer |
| gptkbp:outcome |
property division
settled joint custody |
| gptkbp:precedent |
family law cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Kua_v._Kua_(No_40)
gptkb:Kua_v._Kua_(No_38) |
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark case
|
| gptkbp:year |
2020
|