Properties (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
2017/000123
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Judgment delivered
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Appeal
A24/2017 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:date |
2018-05-02
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
Appellant Kiefel
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kiefel v Kiefel (2018)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Family law precedents
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Kiefel_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Family law
Child support Financial agreements Family law reforms Judicial discretion Enforcement of child support orders Best interests of the child Appeal rights Mediation outcomes Judicial review of decisions Child support assessments Child custody arrangements Discretion of the court Division of property Enforcement of property orders Equitable distribution of assets Family violence considerations Financial disclosure requirements Financial needs of parties Impact of domestic violence on custody Impact of financial misconduct Impact of new relationships on support Impact of separation on children Legal costs in family law cases Legal representation in family law matters Maintenance obligations Property adjustment orders Property settlement Property settlement agreements Role of expert evidence Solicitor for the Respondent Spousal contributions Spousal maintenance Validity of financial agreements Variation of support payments Solicitor_for_the_Appellant |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Resolved
[2018] HCA 16 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Appeal allowed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Family_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:publicSpeaking |
gptkb:Canberra
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Kiefel_v_Kiefel_(No_2)_(2018)
|
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
Respondent_Kiefel
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified family law principles
|