Properties (64)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
case
|
| gptkbp:aftermath |
increased public awareness of property rights
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
04-108
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
subsequent eminent domain cases
|
| gptkbp:court |
City of New London
Susette Kelo 5-4 decision |
| gptkbp:criticism |
property rights advocates
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:discusses |
law schools
|
| gptkbp:featuredIn |
legal textbooks
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
gptkb:Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kelo
|
| gptkbp:impact |
increased scrutiny of eminent domain laws
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
public policy debates
local government policies state constitutional amendments national discussions on property rights |
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
economic development arguments
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
Justice Clarence Thomas |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
eminent domain
public use vs. private benefit set a precedent for economic development takings |
| gptkbp:legislation |
prompted state legislatures to pass laws limiting eminent domain
|
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:New_London,_Connecticut
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the use of eminent domain
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
mixed reactions
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Hawaii_Housing_Authority_v._Midkiff
gptkb:Berman_v._Parker |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Takings_Clause_of_the_Fifth_Amendment
economic inequality land use planning civil rights economic justice government accountability local governance public-private partnerships social justice issues constitutional law judicial review legal reform property rights community activism real estate development community displacement community planning government intervention public interest law social policy property development urban policy legal ethics land ownership rights public policy analysis land use conflicts urban redevelopment projects government power land use regulation economic revitalization efforts |
| gptkbp:significance |
controversial decision
|
| gptkbp:supportedBy |
urban planners
|
| gptkbp:year |
2005
|