Statements (53)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
gptkbp:affiliatedWith |
civil rights organizations
pro-life groups |
gptkbp:appeal |
gptkb:Kansas_Court_of_Appeals
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
constitutional law
administrative law civil rights law election law 2018-CV-000123 |
gptkbp:community_engagement |
abortion debate
|
gptkbp:court |
majority opinion
5-2 ruling state court balancing test strict scrutiny standard dissenting opinion upheld by higher court affirmed lower court decision |
gptkbp:date |
August 2019
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Kansas_Supreme_Court
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kansans for Life v. Kobach
|
gptkbp:impact |
state election laws
affects voter turnout |
gptkbp:influences |
future legislation
|
gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Kris_Kobach
gptkb:Kansans_for_Life |
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Kris_Kobach
gptkb:Kansans_for_Life |
gptkbp:judges |
constitutional review
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
voter registration
against state law against voter ID requirements |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:state_of_Kansas |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
Fourteenth Amendment rights
First_Amendment_rights |
gptkbp:legislation |
Kansas_voter_ID_law
|
gptkbp:media_coverage |
high-profile case
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
voter suppression claims
national implications |
gptkbp:outcome |
influenced public policy
reaffirmed state authority set legal precedent increased scrutiny on voter laws limited voter access sparked further litigation upheld voter registration law upheld_voter_ID_law |
gptkbp:precedent |
affects future cases
|
gptkbp:related_to |
reproductive rights
election law |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on abortion rights
|
gptkbp:year |
2019
|