Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009
GPTKB entity
Statements (103)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legislation
|
| gptkbp:administered_by |
gptkb:Judicial_Appointments_Commission
|
| gptkbp:affects |
judicial independence
|
| gptkbp:amended_by |
subsequent legislation
|
| gptkbp:amends |
gptkb:Judicial_Appointments_Commission
|
| gptkbp:applies_to |
judicial appointments in England and Wales
|
| gptkbp:created |
Judicial Appointments Commission members
|
| gptkbp:date_enacted |
gptkb:2009
|
| gptkbp:enacted_by |
gptkb:Parliament_of_the_United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:ensures |
merit-based appointments
|
| gptkbp:establishes |
gptkb:Judicial_Appointments_Commission
criteria for judicial appointments |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009
|
| gptkbp:improves |
accountability in judicial appointments
|
| gptkbp:includes |
provisions for diversity in the judiciary
|
| gptkbp:influences |
judicial diversity policies
|
| gptkbp:is_analyzed_in |
policy discussions
think tanks policy reports legal commentators legal assessments |
| gptkbp:is_challenged_by |
courts
legal disputes opposition parties legal critics |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
legal discussions on judicial appointments
|
| gptkbp:is_connected_to |
legal reforms in the UK
judicial review processes judicial accountability frameworks legal accountability measures judicial reform strategies |
| gptkbp:is_considered |
gptkb:legal_reforms
|
| gptkbp:is_criticized_for |
lack of representation
|
| gptkbp:is_critiqued_by |
civil society organizations
legal journals policy papers judicial watchdogs |
| gptkbp:is_debated_in |
public discussions
legal scholars Parliamentary sessions public interest groups |
| gptkbp:is_discussed_in |
gptkb:academic_conferences
gptkb:media_outlets gptkb:legal_case legal experts public forums policy analysts |
| gptkbp:is_evaluated_by |
gptkb:academic_research
legal scholars government bodies legal institutions government assessments judicial performance reviews |
| gptkbp:is_examined_in |
gptkb:legal_frameworks
regulatory bodies academic studies legal analyses government evaluations |
| gptkbp:is_implemented_in |
gptkb:Judicial_Appointments_Commission
|
| gptkbp:is_influenced_by |
gptkb:public_opinion
public policy debates international standards legal precedents international law standards |
| gptkbp:is_linked_to |
judicial training programs
judicial ethics judicial ethics guidelines judicial oversight mechanisms judicial selection criteria |
| gptkbp:is_part_of |
judicial reform initiatives
judicial governance judicial selection process judicial governance framework legal framework in the UK judicial policy framework judicial reform discourse |
| gptkbp:is_promoted_by |
legal conferences
legal reform advocates legal advocacy campaigns judicial reform organizations |
| gptkbp:is_referenced_in |
gptkb:court_cases
legal textbooks government reports legal case studies judicial training materials |
| gptkbp:is_related_to |
judicial accountability
judicial reform |
| gptkbp:is_reviewed_by |
gptkb:Parliament_of_the_United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:is_subject_to |
judicial review
Parliamentary scrutiny |
| gptkbp:is_supported_by |
legal professionals
advocacy groups legal associations judicial reform advocates legal reform coalitions |
| gptkbp:mandates |
public advertisement of judicial vacancies
|
| gptkbp:oversees |
selection process for judges
|
| gptkbp:provides |
transparency in judicial appointments
|
| gptkbp:purpose |
to regulate the appointment of judges
|
| gptkbp:repealed_by |
Judicial Appointments Act 2003
|
| gptkbp:requires |
consultation with the Lord Chief Justice
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Edward_Thurlow,_1st_Baron_Thurlow
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|