|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Mandal_Commission_case
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
Affirmative action
Reservation policy
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:AIR_1993_SC_477
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:India
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
16 November 1992
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
|
gptkbp:effect
|
established creamy layer concept
set precedent for reservation policy in India
upheld 27% reservation for OBCs
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
reservation in public employment is valid
reservation should not exceed 50%
creamy layer should be excluded from OBC reservation
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Indra Sawhney case
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Justice_A.M._Ahmadi
gptkb:Justice_B.L._Hansaria
gptkb:Justice_B.P._Jeevan_Reddy
gptkb:Justice_Kuldip_Singh
gptkb:Justice_M.H._Kania
gptkb:Justice_P.B._Sawant
gptkb:Justice_R.M._Sahai
gptkb:Justice_S._Ratnavel_Pandian
Justice J.S. Verma
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
challenge to Mandal Commission recommendations
|
|
gptkbp:powers
|
9 judges
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Mandal_Commission
gptkb:Other_Backward_Classes
reservation in India
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Mandal_Commission_implementation
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|