|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
legal case
|
|
gptkbp:controversy
|
50% cap on reservations
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:New_Delhi
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Indira Sawhney v. Union of India
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Mandal_Commission_recommendations
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_M._S._Liberhan
gptkb:Justice_R._P._Sethi
gptkb:Justice_K._Ramaswamy
gptkb:Justice_S._R._Pandian
gptkb:Justice_S._S._M._Quadri
gptkb:Justice_S._R._Sinha
gptkb:Justice_S._C._Agarwal
gptkb:Justice_B._N._Kirpal
August 13, 1992
upheld OBC reservations
|
|
gptkbp:legalStatus
|
Constitutional Law
Reservation in government jobs
|
|
gptkbp:notableFeature
|
1992 Supp (3) SCC 217
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
upheld the validity of OBC reservations
|
|
gptkbp:politicalAffiliation
|
gptkb:Union_of_India
gptkb:Indira_Sawhney
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
set guidelines for OBC reservations
|
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent
|
gptkb:Vishaka_v._State_of_Rajasthan
gptkb:Ashoka_Kumar_Thakur_v._Union_of_India
gptkb:State_of_Kerala_v._N._M._Thomas
Indra_Sawhney_v._Union_of_India_(1992)
Mandal_Commission_case
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
1992
|