Statements (20)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[2017] UKSC 17
|
| gptkbp:claimedBy |
Heather Ilott
|
| gptkbp:date |
2017
|
| gptkbp:defendant |
Melita Jackson's estate
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Ilott (Respondent) v The Blue Cross and others (Appellants)
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Ilott v Mitson
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
England and Wales
|
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
inheritance law
family provision |
| gptkbp:notableFor |
clarifying principles for reasonable financial provision
impact on charitable legacies |
| gptkbp:numberOfIssues |
claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
testator's freedom |
| gptkbp:predecessor |
claims by adult children under the 1975 Act
|
| gptkbp:relatedLegislation |
Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
|
| gptkbp:result |
Supreme Court restored the original award to the claimant
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Sarah_Raffray
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|