|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
No. 14-275
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:Agriculture
unanimous decision
increased scrutiny of government actions
influenced public policy debates
legal precedent for future cases
shaped future legal arguments
economic implications for farmers
government regulation of private property
raised awareness of property rights issues
affected agricultural economics
strengthened property rights advocacy
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
property rights protection
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
constitutional law
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
October 14, 2014
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
Supreme Court Docket
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
June 22, 2015
|
|
gptkbp:enforces
|
gptkb:United_States_Department_of_Agriculture
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Horne v. Department of Agriculture
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
agricultural regulations
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Agriculture
Horne
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
California raisin market
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
government seizure of property
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
affirmed lower court ruling
government must pay for property taken
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
just compensation
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:Pacific_Legal_Foundation
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
ruled in favor of Horne
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Takings Clause
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
gptkb:Lucas_v._South_Carolina_Coastal_Council
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
property rights
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2015
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Pacific_Legal_Foundation
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|