|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:law
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
180 U.S.P.Q. 673
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
October 19, 1973
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Illinois_Scientific_Developments,_Inc.
gptkb:Sperry_Rand_Corporation
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Honeywell,_Inc._v._Sperry_Rand_Corp.
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
opened computer industry to competition
affected computer industry patent licensing
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Earl_R._Larson
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Minnesota
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
patent enforceability
patent validity
fraud on the Patent Office
prior art
|
|
gptkbp:notableFor
|
landmark case in computer patent law
invalidated the ENIAC patent
|
|
gptkbp:patent
|
gptkb:Electronic_Numerical_Integrator_and_Computer_(ENIAC)
gptkb:U.S._Patent_3,120,606
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Honeywell,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
future computer patent cases
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:ENIAC
gptkb:J._Presper_Eckert
gptkb:John_Atanasoff
gptkb:John_Mauchly
|
|
gptkbp:result
|
ENIAC patent declared invalid
ENIAC patent found unenforceable due to fraud on the Patent Office
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:ENIAC_patent
computer patent law
|
|
gptkbp:yearFiled
|
1967
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Sperry_Rand
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Honeywell v. Sperry Rand
|