|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Nieves_v._Bartlett
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
04-278
|
|
gptkbp:controversy
|
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2006
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
04-278
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
January 2006
|
|
gptkbp:historical_debate
|
gptkb:Paul_D._Clement
October 2005
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Hartman v. Moore
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Influences future First Amendment cases
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
547 U. S. 250
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
First Amendment rights
Retaliation claims require proof of lack of probable cause
|
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
gptkb:Bivens_v._Six_Unknown_Named_Agents
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Supreme Court ruled in favor of Moore
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Establishes standards for retaliatory prosecution claims
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_David_Souter
|
|
gptkbp:signed_by
|
gptkb:Justices_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justices_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
Justices Stephen Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Clarifies standards for evaluating retaliatory prosecution
|