Harris v. State of Western Australia
GPTKB entity
Properties (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
criminal appeal
misdirection by trial judge |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
CA_1_of_2007
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Western_Australia
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Harris v. State of Western Australia
|
| gptkbp:impact |
legal reforms
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Harris
State of Western Australia |
| gptkbp:judges |
January 2007
appeal dismissed Justice Pullin Justice_McLure Justice_Wheeler |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
self-defense
evidence admission jury instructions |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
defense counsel
prosecution counsel |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
actus reus
judicial independence judicial review case law appeal process fair trial due process defense strategy court procedures criminal procedure court hierarchy legal ethics burden of proof reasonable doubt prosecutorial discretion legal standing statutory interpretation evidence law precedent value appeal rights Australian_law mens_rea |
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:Western_Australia
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
criminal law interpretation
evidence handling self-defense standards [2007] WASCA 1 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:R_v._McKenzie
gptkb:R_v._Smith gptkb:R_v._Kearney gptkb:R_v._McCarthy R v. McDonald |
| gptkbp:year |
2007
|