Properties (65)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
21-1234
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:date |
March 15, 2021
June 1, 2021 |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
unanimous
|
| gptkbp:deployedTo |
2021-1234
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Hansen vs. Martel
|
| gptkbp:impact |
contract enforcement
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Hansen
Martel |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Doe
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
performance standards
breach of contract contract law statute of limitations contractual obligations legal remedies damages contractual terms consideration enforceability liquidated damages remedies force majeure rescission implied contracts specific performance waiver of rights equitable remedies estoppel mutual assent breach of warranty void contracts voidable contracts contract interpretation delegation of duties third-party beneficiaries unconscionability freedom to contract implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose implied warranty of merchantability anticipatory breach assignment of rights commercial impracticability contractual capacity contractual defenses discharge of contracts express contracts fraud in the inducement frustration of purpose modification of contracts parol evidence rule performance excuses statute of frauds good_faith |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Hansen's_attorney
Martel's_attorney |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Smith
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Hansen_v._Martel,_2021
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Smith_v._Jones
Doe v. Roe |
| gptkbp:year |
2021
|