Haida Nation v. British Columbia

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:area	gptkb:Government_of_India Indigenous people
gptkbp:citation	gptkb:2004_SCC_73 [2004] 3 S.C.R. 511
gptkbp:country	gptkb:Canada
gptkbp:date	2004-11-18
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:Haida_Nation_v._British_Columbia_(Minister_of_Forests)
gptkbp:hasKeyword	gptkb:hotel consultation resource development Aboriginal title
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Haida Nation v. British Columbia
gptkbp:impact	Established framework for Crown consultation with Indigenous peoples
gptkbp:involvedIn	gptkb:Government_of_British_Columbia gptkb:Haida_Nation gptkb:Weyerhaeuser_Company_Limited
gptkbp:leader	gptkb:Beverley_McLachlin
gptkbp:predecessor	Aboriginal consultation jurisprudence in Canada
gptkbp:principle	Duty arises when Crown has knowledge of potential Aboriginal rights Duty cannot be delegated to third parties Crown has duty to consult and accommodate Aboriginal peoples Duty exists even before Aboriginal rights are proven
gptkbp:province	gptkb:British_Columbia
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Mikisew_Cree_First_Nation_v._Canada gptkb:Taku_River_Tlingit_First_Nation_v._British_Columbia
gptkbp:subject	Aboriginal law Crown duty duty to consult
gptkbp:unanimousDecision	true
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Haida
gptkbp:bfsLayer	5