H.R. 41 - For the People Act
GPTKB entity
Statements (50)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legislation
|
gptkbp:addresses |
gerrymandering
|
gptkbp:aimsTo |
voter suppression
election security expand access to voting |
gptkbp:approves |
numerous advocacy groups
|
gptkbp:associated_with |
increased voter participation
|
gptkbp:designedBy |
voting rights reforms
|
gptkbp:enhances |
campaign finance transparency
|
gptkbp:established |
a national standard for voting
|
gptkbp:faced |
filibuster challenges
|
gptkbp:has |
restore public trust in elections
|
gptkbp:has_a_focus_on |
progressive lawmakers
|
gptkbp:has_implications_for |
future elections
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
H.R. 41 - For the People Act
|
gptkbp:includes |
automatic voter registration
same-day registration |
gptkbp:introduced |
January 2019
Representative_John_Sarbanes |
gptkbp:is_a_subject_of |
election integrity
the role of government in elections |
gptkbp:is_aimed_at |
increasing voter turnout
|
gptkbp:is_designed_to |
reduce the influence of money in politics
|
gptkbp:is_essential_for |
gptkb:the_Biden_administration
fair elections contemporary political discourse. |
gptkbp:is_linked_to |
the fight against misinformation in elections
|
gptkbp:is_part_of |
protect democracy
Democratic_Party's_platform a_larger_Democratic_agenda |
gptkbp:is_supported_by |
gptkb:the_American_Civil_Liberties_Union
various civil rights organizations |
gptkbp:is_used_in |
political polarization
Congressional hearings voter access subsequent Congresses the_Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 |
gptkbp:mandates |
voter ID requirements
online voter registration restoration of voting rights after prison |
gptkbp:measures |
disclosure of campaign ad sponsors
|
gptkbp:members |
use paper ballots
|
gptkbp:opposedBy |
some_Republican_lawmakers
|
gptkbp:requires |
states to offer early voting
|
gptkbp:suitableFor |
a landmark voting rights bill
|
gptkbp:supports |
restoration of voting rights for felons
|
gptkbp:was_a_response_to |
2016 election interference
state-level voting restrictions public demand for voting reform the_Supreme_Court's_decision_on_Shelby_County_v._Holder |