Statements (51)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:website
|
gptkbp:archives |
available online
|
gptkbp:associated_with |
gptkb:open-source_software
|
gptkbp:content_type |
news and commentary
|
gptkbp:first_published |
2013-05-16
|
gptkbp:focus |
legal analysis
|
gptkbp:founded_by |
gptkb:Pamela_Jones
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Groklaw
|
gptkbp:impact |
influenced public opinion on software patents
|
gptkbp:language |
English
|
gptkbp:launch_date |
2003-01-01
|
gptkbp:notable_contributor |
community members
|
gptkbp:notable_event |
Pamela Jones' advocacy for open source
Pamela Jones' legal insights SCO's attempts to control Unix copyrights SCO's attempts to monetize Unix SCO's bankruptcy filing SCO's claims against Linux kernel contributors SCO's effect on developer community dynamics SCO's eventual downfall SCO's financial struggles SCO's impact on Linux adoption SCO's impact on software patents debate SCO's impact on tech industry practices SCO's influence on open source policy SCO's lawsuit against IBM SCO's lawsuit against Novell SCO's lawsuit against Red Hat SCO's legacy in tech law SCO's legal actions against Linux users SCO's legal battles in the 2000s SCO's legal strategy analysis SCO's legal team analysis SCO's litigation tactics analysis SCO's public relations challenges SCO's role in software litigation history analysis of copyright issues community mobilization against SCO community response to SCO lawsuits community support for Linux developers coverage of software freedom issues discussion of open source licenses impact on software development community influence on legal discourse in tech SCO's role in shaping legal frameworks for software |
gptkbp:notable_for |
coverage of SCO Group v. IBM
|
gptkbp:parent_organization |
gptkb:Open_Source_Initiative
|
gptkbp:status |
inactive
|
gptkbp:type |
gptkb:Journalist
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Pamela_Jones
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|