|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
court case
|
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome
|
expanded federal powers
federal law upheld
|
|
gptkbp:caseTypes
|
constitutional law
No. 1
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Lewis_F._Powell_Jr.
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Tom_C._Clark
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:Felix_Frankfurter
gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan_II
January 15, 1934
October Term 1933
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1934
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:historicalContext
|
Great Depression
|
|
gptkbp:historicalEvent
|
appealed from lower court
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Gonzales vs. McCulloch 1934
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
influenced future federalism cases
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
yes
affirmed lower court ruling
upheld federal regulations
no_dissent
|
|
gptkbp:legalStatus
|
federalism
strengthened federal government
Supremacy Clause
federal authority vs. state authority
federal vs. state jurisdiction
attorney_for_Gonzales
attorney_for_McCulloch
|
|
gptkbp:notableFeature
|
important for state-federal relations
293 U.S. 1 (1934)
examined federal powers
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
upheld federal authority
|
|
gptkbp:politicalAffiliation
|
gptkb:McCulloch
Gonzales
|
|
gptkbp:politicalParty
|
unanimous decision
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
federal regulatory power
|
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent
|
gptkb:Gibbons_v._Ogden
gptkb:Wickard_v._Filburn
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
Commerce Clause
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
established precedent for federal power
|