Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated
GPTKB entity
Statements (21)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:appealRuling |
Reversed in favor of Qualcomm
|
| gptkbp:appealsTo |
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
|
| gptkbp:citation |
411 F. Supp. 3d 658 (N.D. Cal. 2019)
969 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2020) |
| gptkbp:date |
2020-08-11
|
| gptkbp:defendant |
gptkb:Qualcomm_Incorporated
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated
|
| gptkbp:initialRuling |
Qualcomm violated antitrust law
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Lucy_H._Koh
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
|
| gptkbp:plaintiff |
gptkb:Federal_Trade_Commission
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
standard-essential patents
mobile phone industry competition law in the United States |
| gptkbp:result |
Qualcomm prevailed on appeal
|
| gptkbp:subject |
antitrust law
patent licensing FRAND obligations |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:FTC_v._Qualcomm
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|