Statements (66)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:area |
antitrust law
|
gptkbp:argued_on |
November 14, 1961
|
gptkbp:conducts_research_on |
gptkb:economic_analysis
gptkb:strategy gptkb:government_policies gptkb:regulations market competition regulatory scrutiny consumer welfare competitive landscape product differentiation economic impact collusion market share market entry price discrimination market dynamics barriers to entry economic regulation market power market structure antitrust litigation monopolization remedies antitrust enforcement market definition divestiture merger guidelines merger review process antitrust enforcement actions horizontal mergers predatory pricing vertical mergers business mergers conglomerate mergers business consolidation competitive effects price effects efficiencies defense |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:1962
March 5, 1962 |
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan_II
|
gptkbp:docket_number |
No. 61
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
FTC v. Brown Shoe Co.
|
gptkbp:impact |
retail industry
|
gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:Clayton_Act
gptkb:Sherman_Act |
gptkbp:involved |
antitrust laws
|
gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Brown_Shoe_Company
gptkb:Federal_Trade_Commission |
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
384 U. S. 316
|
gptkbp:is_relevant_to |
competition policy
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
market concentration
|
gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed the FTC's decision
|
gptkbp:outcome_influenced |
gptkb:business_practices
|
gptkbp:precedent |
future antitrust cases
|
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:FTC_v._Procter_&_Gamble_Co.
|
gptkbp:related_to |
consumer protection
mergers and acquisitions |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on merger regulations
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:FTC_v._A._E._Staley_Manufacturing_Co.
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|