Statements (25)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:appealCourt |
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
|
| gptkbp:appealsTo |
gptkb:Apple_Inc.
gptkb:Epic_Games |
| gptkbp:defendant |
gptkb:Apple_Inc.
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
2020-08-13 |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Epic Games v. Apple lawsuit
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced app store policies
sparked antitrust debates in tech industry |
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Yvonne_Gonzalez_Rogers
|
| gptkbp:mediaAttention |
high
|
| gptkbp:numberOfIssues |
anti-competitive practices
monopolization App Store payment policies |
| gptkbp:plaintiff |
gptkb:Epic_Games
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:App_Store
gptkb:Fortnite Epic Games v. Google |
| gptkbp:result |
Apple required to allow alternative payment methods
Apple not found to be a monopoly |
| gptkbp:verdict |
mixed
2021-09-10 |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Google_v._Epic_Games_lawsuit
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|