|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:law
|
|
gptkbp:appealsTo
|
both parties appealed
|
|
gptkbp:Apple_argument
|
App Store policies ensure security and privacy
|
|
gptkbp:Apple_response
|
removed Fortnite from App Store
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2021-09-10
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Apple_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:endDate
|
2021-09-10
|
|
gptkbp:Epic_Games_action
|
implemented direct payment system in Fortnite
|
|
gptkbp:Epic_Games_argument
|
Apple's App Store practices are monopolistic
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Epic Games v. Apple
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
influenced app store regulations
sparked global debate on digital marketplaces
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Yvonne_Gonzalez_Rogers
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
|
|
gptkbp:legalBasis
|
gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
gptkb:California_Unfair_Competition_Law
|
|
gptkbp:mediaCoverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Epic_Games
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:App_Store
gptkb:Fortnite
|
|
gptkbp:result
|
Apple not found to be a monopoly under federal antitrust law
mixed ruling
Apple required to allow alternative payment methods
|
|
gptkbp:startDate
|
2020-08-13
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
antitrust
in-app purchases
app store policies
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Epic_vs._Apple_trial
gptkb:Epic_vs._Google_trial
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|