Statements (123)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Edalji case
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
gptkb:legal_reforms
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:George_Edalji
gptkb:historical_narratives gptkb:philosophical_debates gptkb:public_discourse gptkb:historical_context gptkb:historical_revisionism gptkb:historical_significance gptkb:investigative_journalism gptkb:media_coverage gptkb:memory gptkb:social_justice gptkb:social_movements gptkb:legal_case civic engagement public accountability public policy ethical considerations expert opinions journalistic integrity theoretical frameworks academic studies advocacy groups government accountability historical documentation human rights issues social responsibility social stratification witness testimonies cultural memory judicial review civil liberties appeal process community activism emotional impact forensic evidence journalistic ethics legal accountability public perception critical analysis moral implications psychological factors historical context analysis cultural impact media analysis government transparency public outcry community relations legal advocacy sociological perspectives personal narratives public transparency false accusations judicial transparency legal ethics judicial precedents police conduct investigative procedures legal history legal analysis personal accountability testimonials moral accountability interpersonal dynamics public debates legal transparency judicial integrity literary references public trust in law enforcement cultural journalism documentary analysis media responsibility historical accountability ethnic discrimination historical journalism social accountability scholarly critiques ethical accountability community accountability historical testimonies civic transparency local community tensions social journalism animal mutilation community testimonies community transparency critical accountability critical transparency cultural accountability cultural transparency emotional accountability emotional transparency ethical transparency expert accountability expert transparency historical transparency legal testimonies moral transparency personal transparency philosophical accountability philosophical transparency psychological accountability psychological transparency scholarly accountability scholarly transparency social transparency sociological accountability sociological transparency theoretical accountability theoretical transparency |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
presumption of innocence
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Dr._Arthur_Conan_Doyle
|
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:England
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
exoneration
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
racial prejudice
|
| gptkbp:significance |
highlighted flaws in the justice system
|
| gptkbp:type |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:year |
1903
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:George_Edalji
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|