Sophistical Refutations
E916204
Sophistical Refutations is an Aristotelian treatise that analyzes fallacious arguments and explains how to detect and refute them in dialectical reasoning.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Sophistical Refutations canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T11272637 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sophistical Refutations Context triple: [Aristotle's writings, containsWork, Sophistical Refutations]
-
A.
Adversus Rhetoras
Adversus Rhetoras is an ancient work of skeptical philosophy, traditionally attributed to Sextus Empiricus, that critically examines and challenges the claims and methods of rhetorical theorists.
-
B.
Commentaries on Plato
Commentaries on Plato is a series of Byzantine philosophical works in which Michael Psellos analyzes and interprets Plato’s dialogues within a Christian intellectual framework.
-
C.
Adversus Logicos
Adversus Logicos is a work by the ancient skeptic philosopher Sextus Empiricus that critically examines and challenges the foundations of logical theory.
-
D.
Commentaries on Aristotle
Commentaries on Aristotle are a series of influential medieval philosophical and theological works in which St. Thomas Aquinas analyzes and interprets Aristotle’s writings, integrating them with Christian thought.
-
E.
Plato's Charmides
Plato's "Charmides" is a Socratic dialogue that explores the nature of temperance (sophrosyne) through a philosophical conversation between Socrates and the young Charmides, with characters like Critobulus appearing in the discussion.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sophistical Refutations Target entity description: Sophistical Refutations is an Aristotelian treatise that analyzes fallacious arguments and explains how to detect and refute them in dialectical reasoning.
-
A.
Adversus Rhetoras
Adversus Rhetoras is an ancient work of skeptical philosophy, traditionally attributed to Sextus Empiricus, that critically examines and challenges the claims and methods of rhetorical theorists.
-
B.
Commentaries on Plato
Commentaries on Plato is a series of Byzantine philosophical works in which Michael Psellos analyzes and interprets Plato’s dialogues within a Christian intellectual framework.
-
C.
Adversus Logicos
Adversus Logicos is a work by the ancient skeptic philosopher Sextus Empiricus that critically examines and challenges the foundations of logical theory.
-
D.
Commentaries on Aristotle
Commentaries on Aristotle are a series of influential medieval philosophical and theological works in which St. Thomas Aquinas analyzes and interprets Aristotle’s writings, integrating them with Christian thought.
-
E.
Plato's Charmides
Plato's "Charmides" is a Socratic dialogue that explores the nature of temperance (sophrosyne) through a philosophical conversation between Socrates and the young Charmides, with characters like Critobulus appearing in the discussion.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Aristotelian work
ⓘ
logical work ⓘ philosophical treatise ⓘ |
| aimsTo |
classify fallacies
ⓘ
improve dialectical reasoning ⓘ provide techniques for refuting sophisms ⓘ |
| author | Aristotle NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| concerns |
dialectical method
ⓘ
errors in reasoning ⓘ techniques of debate ⓘ |
| dealsWith |
apparent refutations
ⓘ
eristic reasoning ⓘ sophistical arguments ⓘ |
| distinguishes |
apparent refutations
ⓘ
real refutations ⓘ |
| focusesOn |
detection of fallacies
ⓘ
fallacious arguments ⓘ methods of refutation ⓘ |
| hasGenre |
logical treatise
ⓘ
philosophical logic ⓘ |
| hasSubjectArea |
logic
ⓘ
philosophy ⓘ rhetoric ⓘ |
| historicalPeriod | Classical Greek philosophy ⓘ |
| influenced |
informal logic
ⓘ
medieval logic ⓘ scholastic philosophy ⓘ theory of argumentation ⓘ |
| isPartOfCurriculum | Aristotelian logic NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| mainTopic |
argumentation
ⓘ
dialectic ⓘ fallacies ⓘ logic ⓘ |
| originalLanguage | Ancient Greek ⓘ |
| originalTitle | Σοφιστικοὶ Ἔλεγχοι NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| partOf | Organon NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| philosophicalTradition | Peripatetic school NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedWork |
Categories
ⓘ
On Interpretation NERFINISHED ⓘ Posterior Analytics NERFINISHED ⓘ Prior Analytics NERFINISHED ⓘ Topics NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| studiedIn |
argumentation theory
ⓘ
history of logic ⓘ history of philosophy ⓘ |
| title | Sophistical Refutations NERFINISHED ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Sophistical Refutations Description of subject: Sophistical Refutations is an Aristotelian treatise that analyzes fallacious arguments and explains how to detect and refute them in dialectical reasoning.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.