Alabama Claims arbitration

Target entity: Alabama Claims arbitration
Context triple: [Anglo-American wars, notableEvent, Alabama Claims arbitration]

• A. Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims
  Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims is a collection of influential legal arguments presented by American lawyer William M. Evarts in the international arbitration case between the United States and Great Britain over Civil War-era maritime claims.
• B. Alabama v. Texas
  Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
• C. Virginia v. Tennessee
  Virginia v. Tennessee is an 1893 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified when interstate agreements require congressional approval under the Constitution’s Compact Clause.
• D. Toledo War
  The Toledo War was a 19th-century boundary dispute between the U.S. states of Ohio and Michigan over control of the Toledo Strip, resolved largely through political negotiation rather than armed conflict.
• E. Yazoo land controversy resolution
  The Yazoo land controversy resolution was the early 19th-century settlement of a massive Georgia land fraud scandal, in which the federal government compensated claimants and helped define federal authority over state land claims.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Alabama Claims arbitration
Target entity description: The Alabama Claims arbitration was an 1872 international tribunal in Geneva that resolved U.S. demands for damages from Britain over Confederate commerce raiders built in British shipyards during the American Civil War, becoming a landmark in the peaceful settlement of international disputes.

• A. Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims
  Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims is a collection of influential legal arguments presented by American lawyer William M. Evarts in the international arbitration case between the United States and Great Britain over Civil War-era maritime claims.
• B. Alabama v. Texas
  Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
• C. Virginia v. Tennessee
  Virginia v. Tennessee is an 1893 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified when interstate agreements require congressional approval under the Constitution’s Compact Clause.
• D. Toledo War
  The Toledo War was a 19th-century boundary dispute between the U.S. states of Ohio and Michigan over control of the Toledo Strip, resolved largely through political negotiation rather than armed conflict.
• E. Yazoo land controversy resolution
  The Yazoo land controversy resolution was the early 19th-century settlement of a massive Georgia land fraud scandal, in which the federal government compensated claimants and helped define federal authority over state land claims.
• F. None of above. chosen