J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
E821205
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court case that held peremptory jury strikes based solely on gender violate the Equal Protection Clause.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. canonical | 2 |
| Alabama ex rel. T.B. | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T9799070 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. Context triple: [Batson v. Kentucky, laterExtendedBy, J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.]
-
A.
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held individuals are protected from retaliation when they complain about sex discrimination in educational programs receiving federal funding.
-
B.
Epperson v. Arkansas
Epperson v. Arkansas is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down an Arkansas law banning the teaching of evolution in public schools, marking a major victory for the separation of church and state in education.
-
C.
Jackson v. Georgia
Jackson v. Georgia is a United States Supreme Court case that, alongside Furman v. Georgia, addressed the constitutionality and application of the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
-
D.
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a city ordinance that gave officials broad discretion to deny parade permits, reinforcing First Amendment protections for civil rights demonstrators.
-
E.
Powell v. Alabama
Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. Target entity description: J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court case that held peremptory jury strikes based solely on gender violate the Equal Protection Clause.
-
A.
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held individuals are protected from retaliation when they complain about sex discrimination in educational programs receiving federal funding.
-
B.
Epperson v. Arkansas
Epperson v. Arkansas is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down an Arkansas law banning the teaching of evolution in public schools, marking a major victory for the separation of church and state in education.
-
C.
Jackson v. Georgia
Jackson v. Georgia is a United States Supreme Court case that, alongside Furman v. Georgia, addressed the constitutionality and application of the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
-
D.
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a city ordinance that gave officials broad discretion to deny parade permits, reinforcing First Amendment protections for civil rights demonstrators.
-
E.
Powell v. Alabama
Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf | United States Supreme Court case ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
civil cases
ⓘ
criminal cases ⓘ jury selection ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
anti-discrimination law
ⓘ
civil procedure ⓘ constitutional law ⓘ |
| arguedDate | 1993-11-02 ⓘ |
| citation |
114 S. Ct. 1419
ⓘ
128 L. Ed. 2d 89 ⓘ 511 U.S. 127 ⓘ |
| concurrenceBy |
Justice Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
linked to:
Antonin Scalia
|
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
ⓘ
linked to:
Equal Protection Clause
|
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decidedBy | Rehnquist Court ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1994-04-19 ⓘ |
| dissentBy |
Chief Justice William Rehnquist
ⓘ
linked to:
William H. Rehnquist
Justice Antonin Scalia ⓘ
linked to:
Antonin Scalia
Justice Clarence Thomas ⓘ
linked to:
Clarence Thomas
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor ⓘ
linked to:
Sandra Day O’Connor
|
| docketNumber | 92-1239 ⓘ |
| extendedDoctrineOf | Batson v. Kentucky ⓘ |
| holding | Peremptory challenges based solely on gender violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. ⓘ |
| joinedMajority |
Justice Anthony Kennedy
ⓘ
linked to:
Anthony M. Kennedy
Justice David Souter ⓘ
linked to:
David H. Souter
Justice John Paul Stevens ⓘ
linked to:
John Paul Stevens
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
linked to:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor ⓘ
linked to:
Sandra Day O’Connor
|
| jurisdiction |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| legalIssue | use of peremptory challenges based on gender ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Justice Harry Blackmun
ⓘ
linked to:
Harry A. Blackmun
|
| originatedFrom |
Alabama state court
ⓘ
linked to:
Alabama courts
|
| petitioner | J.E.B. ⓘ |
| precedentFor | gender-neutral use of peremptory challenges ⓘ |
| prohibits | gender-based peremptory strikes of jurors ⓘ |
| rearguedDate | 1994-01-18 ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Batson v. Kentucky
ⓘ
Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. ⓘ Georgia v. McCollum ⓘ |
| respondent |
Alabama ex rel. T.B.
ⓘ
linked to:
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
|
| result | reversal of the Alabama court’s judgment ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
jury selection procedures
ⓘ
sex discrimination ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1994 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. Description of subject: J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court case that held peremptory jury strikes based solely on gender violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
linked to: J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.