AT&T avoided immediate antitrust dissolution

E668841

AT&T avoided immediate antitrust dissolution refers to the outcome of the 1913 Kingsbury Commitment, which allowed AT&T to continue operating as a dominant telecommunications company under agreed regulatory constraints instead of being broken up at that time.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
AT&T avoided immediate antitrust dissolution canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (37)

Predicate Object
instanceOf historical antitrust outcome
telecommunications regulation event
allowed AT&T to maintain its integrated Bell System structure
appliesTo American Telephone and Telegraph Company
associatedConcept network effects in telecommunications
public utility style regulation of telecommunications
regulated monopoly
corporateActor AT&T Vice President Nathan Kingsbury
country United States
date 1913
economicImpact preservation of a nationwide integrated telephone network under AT&T control
followedBy continued expansion of AT&T’s Bell System monopoly
later antitrust actions leading to the 1982 AT&T breakup
governmentActor Attorney General James C. McReynolds
historicalPeriod Progressive Era
industry telecommunications
legalContext Sherman Antitrust Act
antitrust law
legalInstrument Kingsbury Commitment
legalNature out-of-court settlement of antitrust concerns
precededBy antitrust investigations of AT&T’s market power
prevented court-ordered dissolution of AT&T in 1913
primaryBeneficiary American Telephone and Telegraph Company
primaryRegulatoryGoal regulation of a natural monopoly rather than its dissolution
refersTo outcome of the 1913 Kingsbury Commitment
regulatoryBodyInvolved United States Department of Justice
United States Interstate Commerce Commission
regulatoryMechanism consent agreement between AT&T and the U.S. government
relatedEvent Kingsbury Commitment
relatedOrganization Bell System
Western Union
resultedIn avoidance of immediate breakup of AT&T
commitment by AT&T to allow interconnection with independent telephone companies
commitment by AT&T to divest its controlling interest in Western Union
continuation of AT&T as a dominant telecommunications company
federal oversight of AT&T’s acquisitions of independent telephone companies
regulatory constraints on AT&T’s operations

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

1913 Kingsbury Commitment effect AT&T avoided immediate antitrust dissolution